DraftGuard— AI
Open the workspace

AI detector proof checklist

Build an AI detector false-positive
proof checklist.

If your writing is questioned, organize evidence of process before you chase another detector result.

Useful for

Students preparing a calm response to an AI detector flag, teacher concern, or authorship question.

Diagnosis

What is probably happening.

A detector result is only one signal. A stronger response shows the work around the essay: planning, reading, drafting, source choices, edits, and places where your own reasoning changed. This page is a checklist for making that evidence easy to review.

  • You have process evidence, but it is scattered across notes, browser tabs, drafts, and messages.
  • The final essay is cleaner than your earlier drafts, so the change looks sudden.
  • Your sources are real but not tied clearly to specific claims in the paper.
  • The suspected sentences are broad enough that they do not reveal your actual reasoning.

Fix sequence

  1. 01

    Preserve the current record

    Do not overwrite everything. Save the submitted file, earlier drafts, version history, outlines, comments, source list, and any feedback you received.

    Tool

    Process guide ->
  2. 02

    Map evidence to the essay

    For each body paragraph, connect one note, source, quote, page number, experiment, class discussion, or personal observation to the claim it supports.

    Tool

    Citation Coach ->
  3. 03

    Explain the revision choices

    Use Risk Check to identify the lines you revised and write one plain reason for each change: clarity, citation, specificity, or assignment fit.

    Tool

    Risk Check ->

Before and after

Before

Evidence folder: final essay, screenshot of score, and one source link.

Better direction

Evidence folder: final essay, outline, three draft versions, source notes with page numbers, comment history, and a paragraph-by-paragraph revision note.

A folder that shows the essay forming is more useful than another detector screenshot.

Before

I wrote this myself and the detector is wrong.

Better direction

Here is my outline from Tuesday, the source notes I used for paragraph two, and the revision history showing when I changed the introduction.

Concrete process evidence sounds calmer and is easier for a teacher to review.

Checklist

What to check before publishing.

  • Submitted essay file and date submitted.
  • Earlier drafts or document version history.
  • Outline, brainstorm notes, assignment prompt, and rubric.
  • Source list with page numbers, quotes, or links tied to specific paragraphs.
  • Comments from classmates, tutors, teachers, or writing center feedback.
  • A short note explaining what changed in each major revision.
  • A sentence-level list of vague or over-polished lines you plan to clarify.
Check a paragraphBrowse workflows

Related workflows

False-positive appeal kit

Build the email, evidence checklist, and revision focus for a review conversation.

Open ->

Teacher says essay is AI

Start with process evidence before chasing another detector score.

Open ->

Check a paragraph

Find the specific lines that sound generic, unsupported, or too polished.

Open ->

FAQ

What counts as proof of writing process?

Useful proof includes version history, outlines, source notes, comments, earlier drafts, screenshots of edits, and a clear explanation of why major changes were made.

Should I include detector screenshots in my evidence folder?

You can keep them, but process evidence is usually more helpful. A detector screenshot does not show how the essay was written.

Can this checklist replace my school's appeal process?

No. Follow your school's policy. This checklist helps you organize the evidence you may need for that conversation or review.