DraftGuard— AI
Open the workspace

AI detector says 100 percent AI

If an AI detector says 100 percent AI,
slow down.

A scary percentage should start a review process, not a frantic full rewrite that erases evidence.

Useful for

Students shocked by a high AI detector percentage on writing they can explain.

Diagnosis

What is probably happening.

A high percentage feels like a verdict, but it still needs context. The right next step is to identify the highlighted passages, preserve the submitted version, and build a clear explanation of drafting, sources, and revisions.

  • The text is highly polished and repeats generic academic patterns.
  • The detector score is being read without confidence, passage highlights, or policy context.
  • The draft may include AI-assisted sections mixed with human revision.
  • The final wording is smoother than the notes, outline, or earlier draft stages.
  • The draft has claims that sound confident but do not show where the evidence came from.

Fix sequence

  1. 01

    Save the current evidence trail

    Keep the submitted draft, earlier versions, outline, source notes, comments, and screenshots before making more changes.

    Tool

    Appeal Kit ->
  2. 02

    Find the sentences causing distrust

    Use Risk Check to separate real writing issues from detector anxiety: generic openings, unsupported claims, repeated rhythm, and over-polished transitions.

    Tool

    Risk Check ->
  3. 03

    Revise with visible reasoning

    Replace broad statements with source notes, class details, specific examples, or a narrower claim you can explain in conversation.

    Tool

    Sentence Rewrite ->

Before and after

Before

It says 100 percent AI, so I need to rewrite everything tonight.

Better direction

I saved the submitted version, checked which passages were highlighted, and matched each paragraph to my draft notes.

Preserving the record comes before rewriting.

Before

The score is wrong because I wrote all of it.

Better direction

The score points to a review question; my response should show draft history, sources, and why the language changed.

Process evidence answers the concern more clearly than outrage.

Checklist

What to check before publishing.

  • Do not overwrite the submitted version before saving evidence.
  • Match each main paragraph to a note, source, example, or draft decision.
  • Rewrite broad claims with narrower wording or real citation support.
  • Keep a short explanation of what changed and why.
  • Use school policy and process evidence instead of arguing only from detector percentages.
Check a paragraphBrowse workflows

Related workflows

False-positive appeal kit

Build the email, evidence checklist, and revision focus for a review conversation.

Open ->

Teacher says essay is AI

Start with process evidence before chasing another detector score.

Open ->

Check a paragraph

Find the specific lines that sound generic, unsupported, or too polished.

Open ->

FAQ

What should I do if an AI detector says 100 percent AI?

Start by preserving your draft history and asking what exact text raised concern. Then prepare evidence of your process before making major rewrites.

Should I make the writing less polished on purpose?

No. Do not add mistakes or weaken the essay. Make the writing more specific, better sourced, and easier to explain.

Can DraftGuard guarantee a detector result?

No. DraftGuard does not guarantee detector outcomes. It helps identify weak sentences and organize transparent revision evidence.